View Full Version : What is Dangerous? Bonking a FL or a FB ?
benjo83
12-12-2011, 10:57 AM
I just want to ask around with some of the sammyboy Tiko Boys here.
Who is either married / Attached but who still bonks around?
Which do you guys think is more dangerous of being caught an FL or a FB?
Let me know guys.:)
amateur.bonker
12-12-2011, 11:46 AM
being caught by who? pls specify..
jasdude
12-12-2011, 11:59 AM
Please rephrase your question cos its very vague . Risk of being caught ?which is higher is it ? FL or FB ? or risk of catching something transmitted ? FL or FB ?
RealEstateGuy
12-12-2011, 12:07 PM
Braddah, no question that you are better off with a FB as far as STDs. Braddah, that's provided its a one on one FB relationship or a one on one FwB relationship.
newyorker88
12-12-2011, 12:10 PM
I just want to ask around with some of the sammyboy Tiko Boys here.
Who is either married / Attached but who still bonks around?
Which do you guys think is more dangerous of being caught an FL or a FB?
Let me know guys.
You mean, kena caught with either a FB or FL?
Both are the same, if you kena caught with your love one. You sure kena fuck by your love one.
Difference is with FL, she just Fuck off later. FB, you got alot of answer to your love one and FB later.
benjo83
12-12-2011, 12:50 PM
In the options of being caught with STD or by your wife?
Some of the Married guys still go for FL which can be risk for STD but caught bonking a FB is not heard of ?
I am attached but still bonks FL from time to time, might want to have a NSA FB one day
BiRd13
12-12-2011, 01:31 PM
Isn't with FL higher risk of getting STD? Though with condom but not 100% safe...
While FB usually are from friends etc... So I guess the chance of having STD with her is lower... No ma?
jasdude
12-12-2011, 01:59 PM
Some of the Married guys still go for FL which can be risk for STD but caught bonking a FB is not heard of ?
I am attached but still bonks FL from time to time, might want to have a NSA FB one day
Isn't with FL higher risk of getting STD? Though with condom but not 100% safe...
While FB usually are from friends etc... So I guess the chance of having STD with her is lower... No ma?
FBs in general are safer . BUT You cannot assume that she or he is exclusively yours unless you two are .Not undermining anything but this is a fact that all so often , FBs will have raw sex after a while . He or she might have a few FBs each , draw and link the hierarchy chain if the FB's FB's FB's FB's FB's FB's FB kena something etc .
sky_liner2
12-12-2011, 02:00 PM
Could it be caught by anti-vice during raids in budget hotels?
teteku
12-12-2011, 02:06 PM
I just want to ask around with some of the sammyboy Tiko Boys here.
Who is either married / Attached but who still bonks around?
Which do you guys think is more dangerous of being caught an FL or a FB?
Let me know guys.:)
Bro,
If STD, the FL is worse, but FB is far more dangerous, if the the FB develops feelings they may even confront your love ones...
Cheers.
Andylin24
12-12-2011, 02:24 PM
I agree with bro teke , some women are not
Contented with just being ur fb , they can be very
Jealous of ur wife
goodpartner
12-12-2011, 02:40 PM
No difference in both especially since there is an overlap between "FB" who sleeps loosely with any men and "FL" who can/are selective of their clients.
I agree with the bro who state that it's an illusion that "FB" tends to give raw when each thinking that they are exclusive to each other. I almost fell off my chair reading the comment that FB equates to "one-to-one" r/s...LMAO.
addthefun
12-12-2011, 03:04 PM
Wanna fuck around then don't bother so much.
AtlasShrugged
12-12-2011, 05:45 PM
Both the same.
But if FB gets pregnant.............
gottosam
12-12-2011, 06:16 PM
Wanna fuck around then don't bother so much.
We live in a small country n have friends/relatives/enemies. So, if one of them happen to see you going into somewhere (b it hotel, apartment) wif a lady who they dun know, wun he/she suspect there's someting fishy? Worse still, wif today's phones which have cameras built-in, pix/vids can be taken easily. If I tink abt all these scenarios, I wld have quitted cheonging long time ago but I decided to take the risk n "fuck it" attitude as the thrill of it more than compensates the risk. Having said tis, tat's my tinking n there r whole lot of "music" one has to face if kena caught (b it in action or STDs). So it's whether one is prepared to face the consequences if the worst case occurs. For me, I still shudder to tink of being caught "red-handed" but from time to time, I adopt the attitude of wat bro addthefun said.
Juz my 2 cts worth:D
Bigbluebird
12-12-2011, 06:38 PM
To each his own preference. Personally I prefer FB but very likely, emotions and feelings will develop overtime generating unnecessary headaches and problems. It's a damn small world out there, don't be surprised your FB is a friend of your friend or even relative :D
Vertu
12-12-2011, 06:55 PM
To each his own preference. Personally I prefer FB but very likely, emotions and feelings will develop overtime generating unnecessary headaches and problems. It's a damn small world out there, don't be surprised your FB is a friend of your friend or even relative :D
Yes.... biggest worry of having a FB is when either side got emotional developing....how many can control one feeling
bonkster
12-12-2011, 06:57 PM
Personally I prefer FB but very likely, emotions and feelings will develop overtime generating unnecessary headaches and problems.
Yup, my FB just asked me today if i'm tired of her because she feels a bit sad that i'm less enthusiastic to see her.
It's always more challenging than paying $80 - 90/hour when i have to answer those kind of questions :(
jasdude
12-12-2011, 07:09 PM
You will soon realize that FB relationships are almost the same as any normal relationship not void of emotions and attachments . FB relationship is SEX first then get to know each other more. Normal relationship is get to know each other well then SEX.
Going off topic soon from Fl & FB to FB emotions and relationships . Hahaha
bonkster
12-12-2011, 09:19 PM
You will soon realize that FB relationships are almost the same as any normal relationship not void of emotions and attachments
Yar...that's y some time ago i posted in a NSA thread that i have never seen a NSA FB. I guess it's only human to hold on to stuff.
Anyway, better go back to the topic of FL vs FB. :p To lower risk, TS should diversify his portfolio by bonking both FLs n FBs! :D
arsenal_84
12-12-2011, 09:29 PM
both are equally risky if one does not learn to protect himself.
wondergal
12-12-2011, 09:32 PM
FBs in general are safer . BUT You cannot assume that she or he is exclusively yours unless you two are .Not undermining anything but this is a fact that all so often , FBs will have raw sex after a while . He or she might have a few FBs each , draw and link the hierarchy chain if the FB's FB's FB's FB's FB's FB's FB kena something etc .
Yea, in general... but good that you described this scenario. Never assume your FB is exclusive to you. It can be a dangerous deadly assumption.
wondergal
12-12-2011, 09:35 PM
You will soon realize that FB relationships are almost the same as any normal relationship not void of emotions and attachments . FB relationship is SEX first then get to know each other more. Normal relationship is get to know each other well then SEX.
So very true.
joew2005
12-12-2011, 09:49 PM
in the case of getting std,neither a fl nor a fb is 100% safe.
although a fl entertains lots of men in a day, she might not be 100% sure kena.
although a fb(what she says only) entertain only @ most a man in a day. she is defintely not 100% safe.
even tat mere 1% could be fatal if u r so lucky ....
jasdude
12-12-2011, 11:26 PM
It can be a dangerous deadly assumption.
So very true.
Yar...that's y some time ago i posted in a NSA thread that i have never seen a NSA FB. I guess it's only human to hold on to stuff.
Anyway, better go back to the topic of FL vs FB. :p To lower risk, TS should diversify his portfolio by bonking both FLs n FBs! :D
No man nor woman can be void of emotions . Its how its controlled that is factor .
Bro,
If STD, the FL is worse, but FB is far more dangerous, if the the FB develops feelings they may even confront your love ones...
Cheers.
I agree with bro teke , some women are not
Contented with just being ur fb , they can be very
Jealous of ur wife
Many men blur the line of FB with their FB cos its is wat they find in the FB that is lacking in the marriage etc the lust , the crave ...... I agree with you bros on your stand point but i urge for a more non bias stand point to the topic . There is one case i know that a emotionally unstable man went bersek cos he cannot stand a rejection and breakup from a FB . He broke down her house door just to want to see her ...... police was called in ........... etc
Hope to hear your comments here http://www.sammyboyforum.com/reputation.php?p=6668239
Yup, my FB just asked me today if i'm tired of her because she feels a bit sad that i'm less enthusiastic to see her.
It's always more challenging than paying $80 - 90/hour when i have to answer those kind of questions :(
Bro , so you are trying to say a hassle free relationship is a paid one ? hahaha
callmebad
13-12-2011, 12:56 AM
FL is purely commercial!
FB can be complicated a bit if he/she is married.
Sometimes, you may not be able to let go off a FB, when he/she wants to end it.
wally888
13-12-2011, 02:52 AM
It's not dangerous if u buy milk outside n not bring the cow home :D
benjo83
13-12-2011, 03:08 AM
I am tired of FL, would prefer a good FB sometimes
jasdude
13-12-2011, 04:17 AM
I am tired of FL, would prefer a good FB sometimes
Are you ready for a FB ? FB vs FL ? TS you have to ask yourself . The time , the effort to maintain one FB vs the convenience and the flexibility of a FL . You cannot have the best of both worlds .
rg2011
13-12-2011, 09:27 AM
I am tired of FL, would prefer a good FB sometimes
Are you ready for a FB ? FB vs FL ? TS you have to ask yourself . The time , the effort to maintain one FB vs the convenience and the flexibility of a FL . You cannot have the best of both worlds .
Bro benjo83, I agree with bro jasdude that you can't have the best of both worlds of enjoying the "come & go" flexibility of a FL and the GFE cum FOC benefits of a FB. Just curious but you don't have to answer me if you don't feel comfy - are you in the process of "transiting" a FL you know to a NSA FB? :D
benjo83
13-12-2011, 10:32 AM
Bro benjo83, I agree with bro jasdude that you can't have the best of both worlds of enjoying the "come & go" flexibility of a FL and the GFE cum FOC benefits of a FB. Just curious but you don't have to answer me if you don't feel comfy - are you in the process of "transiting" a FL you know to a NSA FB? :D
No way man, I never go transiting on that phrase worst case ever, I was thinking of looking for a female FB in the future with NSA. Like in any hump and bye cases. I just thought of those girls when I bonk my ex FB until they found their bf....
Just miss those FB days.:)
BiRd13
14-12-2011, 10:58 AM
FBs in general are safer . BUT You cannot assume that she or he is exclusively yours unless you two are .Not undermining anything but this is a fact that all so often , FBs will have raw sex after a while . He or she might have a few FBs each , draw and link the hierarchy chain if the FB's FB's FB's FB's FB's FB's FB kena something etc .
Agreed... But then again, the percentage is lower compare to FL... At least for FB, even if she/he have a few, perhaps only 5... Compare to FL (Normal or slightly pop one), can have up to 20 sex partner in a month...
Importantly, FB dun need to pay? Except for meals, or hotel... And can go for several rounds, rather than FL which can only go for 1 or 2 round... :D
vBulletin® v3.8.10, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.