View Full Version : Possibly the most expensive BJ in Singapore's history
dk1903
12-06-2012, 11:27 AM
Ex-CNB Chief Ng Boon Gay has just been charged for 4 counts of sex-related corruption.
Apparently, a certain Ms Sue blew him on 4 separate occasions. With the maximum fine of $100,000 staring at Ah Gay, it works out to about $25,000 one blow-job! which brother here can rival that? :)
on a more happy note, i am pleased to inform everyone that i learn a new "high-class" word today. it's . . .
. . Fellatio. it means oral stimulation of a man's penis.
so, next time, i won't be saying BJ 8/10 or 9/10.
i will be saying fellatio 8/10 or 9/10 !! :D
anyway, all guys are fans of fellatio, right? :p
owl888
12-06-2012, 12:07 PM
So who will win? Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Peter Lim or this guy?
Maybe more cumming? :D :D
imax88
12-06-2012, 12:35 PM
on a more happy note, i am pleased to inform everyone that i learn a new "high-class" word today. it's . . .
. . Fellatio. it means oral stimulation of a man's penis.
so, next time, i won't be saying BJ 8/10 or 9/10.
i will be saying fellatio 8/10 or 9/10 !! :D
anyway, all guys are fans of fellatio, right? :p
BJ sound more omph! and easier on the finger when typing....:D
Bebeque
12-06-2012, 12:53 PM
BJ definitely wins hands down (see, no hands used). It describes exactly what the action is versus a chim eye tel lian (???) word which uncles and aunties will find it hard to spell or remember.
dk1903
12-06-2012, 01:39 PM
So who will win? Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Peter Lim or this guy?
Maybe more cumming? :D :D
bro, u r indeed a wise owl.
like what u said - there is no such thing as free sex.
these two chiefs are paying a huge price for thinking that their sexual episodes were free.
looks like the long term decision to pay for a fcuk is still correct.
if not, the fcuk may really come back and bite you in the arse! :D
fun2nite
12-06-2012, 02:22 PM
100k + loss of future earning? (maybe 1 mil). Expensive indeed.
Wonder if any bro with creative juice can come up with a funny pic just like the SCDF chief?
ReferencePoint
12-06-2012, 02:39 PM
I think govt job very stress hor... all these top guys all like bj wan... lol
Xetboy
12-06-2012, 03:07 PM
Life too stressful liao
ReferencePoint
13-06-2012, 04:00 PM
Life too stressful liao
Thats why these top guys must get bj so not so stressful. lol
asdfghjkl
13-06-2012, 04:51 PM
on a more happy note, i am pleased to inform everyone that i learn a new "high-class" word today. it's . . .
. . Fellatio. it means oral stimulation of a man's penis.
i prefer cunnilingus.. hehehe :o
2centsworth
13-06-2012, 05:00 PM
I think govt job very stress hor... all these top guys all like bj wan... lol
You still don't understand why the top guys prefer blow job? I tell you why ok? Blow job is preferred because when the girl swallows, there is no evidence left! :) If a piece of tissue is used, either for the girl to spit into after C I M or to wipe sperm away after sex, then that piece of tissue might be used as evidence in future right? Logic tio boh?
tomcat007
13-06-2012, 05:38 PM
You still don't understand why the top guys prefer blow job? I tell you why ok? Blow job is preferred because when the girl swallows, there is no evidence left! :) If a piece of tissue is used, either for the girl to spit into after C I M or to wipe sperm away after sex, then that piece of tissue might be used as evidence in future right? Logic tio boh?
Wrong lah.. Oral sex not equal to sex mah. They are just learning from Bill Clinton mah..
2centsworth
13-06-2012, 06:16 PM
Oral sex not equal to sex mah. They are just learning from Bill Clinton mah..
Bro, cnb chief is more interesting than Bill Clinton. When Monica blew Bill, we can only use the cigar as an example. When Cecilia blow the cnb chief, we can use more puns. When she smoke his pipe, he went in ecstacy etc. With a surname like Sue and a last name like Gay, the creative possibilities are endless.
For example, the newspapers say Cecilia said there is nothing wrong. We can joke that she is actually misquoted. What she might have said is that there is nothing long (not wrong). :)
I remembered one movie starring Robert De Niro (Mob boss) and Billy Crystal (Shrink).
The Shrink asked the mob boss why he has his gf blow him and not his wife? The mob boss told him that it is crazy because the wife's mouth is to be used for kissing the children's forehead during bedtime.
So who will win? Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Peter Lim or this guy?
Maybe more cumming? :D :D
PAP will win sure
i prefer cunnilingus.. hehehe :o
I also like, want to try together someday ? :D
Bebeque
13-06-2012, 07:35 PM
Wrong lah.. Oral sex not equal to sex mah. They are just learning from Bill Clinton mah..
Clinton got away from being impeached by saying that ...bj is not = sex...
Maybe NBG's lawyers can develop his defence along the same lines.
No wonder Cecelia is so cool now and said that she did nothing wrong!!!!
No wonder NBG said that he is not corrupt and will fight the four charges.
kokonathan
13-06-2012, 10:53 PM
Now the defence lawyers want Prosecutors to proof that Cecilia's tender actually get "preferential treatment" from NBG after the bjs.
Hmm, methinks the reason why nobody admits to the charge is Cecilia is actually NBG's fb.
According to the charge sheet, NBG obtained 4 bjs within a period of 6 months and Cecilia's supposed to have changed employers during this period. Its kinda hard to prove that either employers of Cecilia actually got any "preferential treatment" for any tenders during this period. Singov tenders that need to be approved at NBG level takes notoriously long period of negotiation.
If the prosecution cannot proof that the bjs actually result in unfair advantage by Cecilia's employers over other competitors, they might have to drop the charges but NBG will be reprimanded by DPM TCH for a relationship that results in a conflict of interest.
When I last checked, bjs and adultery are not crimes in Singapore. Then, in the eyes of the law, they really did not do anything wrong. Braddahs, when was the last time you "obtained" bjs from your fbs?
need to check the law section
BJ is belong to which section ? :D
Play along the law section loop hole.:cool:
tomcat007
14-06-2012, 12:39 AM
need to check the law section
BJ is belong to which section ? :D
Play along the law section loop hole.:cool:
Hehe... I was just posting in the other related threads and saw your query here.
I believe having bj not leading to full sex belongs to unnatural sex and is actually convictable. Hence, I'm curious if Ng will be convicted on this charge (Sec. 377, if I'm not wrong) even if he manages to fight off the bribery charge. I wonder what his lawyer will say about it then? Might be a bit anti climax for him to be convicted on unnatural sex after the big hooha...
tomcat007
14-06-2012, 12:40 AM
Clinton got away from being impeached by saying that ...bj is not = sex...
Maybe NBG's lawyers can develop his defence along the same lines.
No wonder Cecelia is so cool now and said that she did nothing wrong!!!!
No wonder NBG said that he is not corrupt and will fight the four charges.
But bj without sex is an offence in Sg. Sextion 377 of Penis Code.
Bebeque
14-06-2012, 11:44 AM
But bj without sex is an offence in Sg. Sextion 377 of Penis Code.
Excuse bro, which part of 377 says bj is an offence?
377 Sexual penetration of a corpse
377A Outrages on decency
377B Sexual penetration with living animal
377C Interpretation of sections 375 to 377B (sexual offences)
377D Mistake as to age
Please demonstrate your legal expertise. :D:D
stone08
14-06-2012, 12:54 PM
So who will win? Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Peter Lim or this guy?
Maybe more cumming? :D :D
Seems that mr lim case is more obvious for the contracts but mr gay is for personal pleasure only? Even mr lim wife stand by him!
stone08
14-06-2012, 12:55 PM
100k + loss of future earning? (maybe 1 mil). Expensive indeed.
History repeats itself over and over again . Women can bring down great men and kingdoms. Helen of Troy, etc
stone08
14-06-2012, 12:58 PM
Clinton got away from being impeached by saying that ...bj is not = sex...
Maybe NBG's lawyers can develop his defence along the same lines.
No wonder Cecelia is so cool now and said that she did nothing wrong!!!!
No wonder NBG said that he is not corrupt and will fight the four charges.
Wah lau eh, mr gay might actually get away with this as there is no intercourse and the BJ is not for bribery.
stone08
14-06-2012, 01:00 PM
Excuse bro, which part of 377 says bj is an offence?
377 Sexual penetration of a corpse
377A Outrages on decency
377B Sexual penetration with living animal
377C Interpretation of sections 375 to 377B (sexual offences)
377D Mistake as to age
Please demonstrate your legal expertise. :D:D
Yea man, any legal expert want to provide clarity?
tomcat007
14-06-2012, 01:32 PM
Excuse bro, which part of 377 says bj is an offence?
377 Sexual penetration of a corpse
377A Outrages on decency
377B Sexual penetration with living animal
377C Interpretation of sections 375 to 377B (sexual offences)
377D Mistake as to age
Please demonstrate your legal expertise. :D:D
Don't remember which section Liao. But I was charged under section 377 more than 20 years ago for having oral sex and was lucky to escape with probation. The io some more say I lucky never kena rape charge which would have meant section 376 and free fuck in prison.
Glen2712
14-06-2012, 01:40 PM
i prefer cunnilingus.. hehehe :o
I love that word, Bro asdfghjkl. :D
P.S: List Of UPPEES is not in full due to the capacity limitation of the signature function (not be longer than 300 characters excluding BB Code markup). Rest assured I've all ur nicks n u'll be awarded. If I do missed u, kindly PM me. :)
Appreciate the PM, Bro David_Ginola, Bro Rw6828, Bro Myo_Swee, Bro XboxSG, Bro Best123, Bro Ahnook78, Bro bhoven, Bro VOGS, Bro nacho, Bro desk13, Bro BatistaSG, Bro steamystreamsg, Bro Linkus, Bro Regaine, Bro evo7_5 and Bro Thongchai!
cheon
14-06-2012, 01:52 PM
thanks for sharing .............. :)
tomcat007
14-06-2012, 01:58 PM
Ok, I take back what u said about oral sex bring illegal and chargeable under Section 377 of the Penal Code. It used to be illegal and chargeable under said section, but a review of the law made it illegal only if either party is not a consenting party in the act or if the act is perform between 2 males. Else, the coast is clear for NBG.
My above post where I said I was charged under 377A is during a time that non penetrative sex is consider unnatural sex and is still chargeable under section 377A. That was more than 20 years ago.
Sorry for the confusion.
2centsworth
14-06-2012, 01:58 PM
But I was charged under section 377 more than 20 years ago for having oral sex and was lucky to escape with probation.
Here you go. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_377A_of_the_Penal_Code_(Singapore)
In summary, the charge you had 20 years ago was repealed in Oct 2007. Blow job is Sept 2007 is illegal. Blow job from Oct 2007 onwards is no longer illegal. Imagine last time, you can tell a girl that if oral sex isn't followed by actual sex, then both of you would have committed a crime. So she must help prevent you from being a criminal by... :)
Blowjob between Men is still illegal although I remember Lee Hsien Loong said then that the police will not be actively going around catching gays for this. If blowjob between men isn't done in public, the government will close 1 eye.
Bebeque
14-06-2012, 02:25 PM
Here you go. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_377A_of_the_Penal_Code_(Singapore)
In summary, the charge you had 20 years ago was repealed in Oct 2007. Blow job is Sept 2007 is illegal. Blow job from Oct 2007 onwards is no longer illegal.
Thanks bro for the clarification.
Found also from a search the following comment - "...In the Singaporean context, recent cases had established that heterosexual fellatio was exempted if indulged in as foreplay which eventually leads to coitus...."
Just come to my mind how smart NBG and Cecelia are:
1 BJ is not illegal, if if they admitted to doing it, it is an act between two consenting adults.
2 When questioned both must have insisted that they only do bj and nothing else. If he said he only asked for bj and she said she only gave bj, and no one else was watching, how to prove otherwise? Further, out of the four alleged acts only two have specific dates in place, whilst the other two were not specific.
Can we believe it? First time, second time, third time, fourth time? Where is the logic in doing so in an affair over a period of six months? I leave it to bros to imagine and decide.
3 Further they are now insisting that they know each other closely even a few years before the alleged incidents. So bj acts are natural development of their close relationship. They just like each others' company and such an act affirms it.
4 Therefore, coming to the crucial point, NBG lawyers then challenged the prosecutors to spell out exactly how the relationship between the two brought about corrupt benefits to the employers of Cecilia. This is a tough task for the prosecutors.
Let the saga continue and all bros will be entertained.
Looks like NBG and Cecilia have good fights on their hands, unless of course, their opposition have other ammunition in place.
tomcat007
14-06-2012, 03:36 PM
Here you go. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_377A_of_the_Penal_Code_(Singapore)
In summary, the charge you had 20 years ago was repealed in Oct 2007. Blow job is Sept 2007 is illegal. Blow job from Oct 2007 onwards is no longer illegal. Imagine last time, you can tell a girl that if oral sex isn't followed by actual sex, then both of you would have committed a crime. So she must help prevent you from being a criminal by... :)
Bro,
I rather take the blow job charge cause if she help me to prevent the blowjob charge, then I will kena the statutory rape charge cause both of us still under 16. :-o
Yup, that's the same link I read from before making my post above retracting my statements that bj without sex is illegal.
2centsworth
14-06-2012, 04:57 PM
I rather take the blow job charge cause if she help me to prevent the blowjob charge, then I will kena the statutory rape charge cause both of us still under 16. :-o .
Actually in this case, it is unlikely that you will be charged for rape if both are under 16. She rape you or you rape her? Some more, there is a need to be careful of putting a rape conviction on the record of a u-16 guy. Which young person isn't horny and curious? To destroy a person's long term future for something he did as a horny, law ignorant guy is too much lah.
I remember Lee Hsien Loong said then that the police will not be actively going around catching gays for this.
When Lee said this, during GE ? :D try to woo more support from man? never remember lai hehe :D
kokonathan
15-06-2012, 12:40 AM
I think NBG and Cecilia will walk away scot-free if NBG's lawyers play their cards right.
According to our respected Mainstream Media, the AGC said that both Cecilia's employers were not direct vendors of CNB at material time. (Last sentence of the article)
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1207419/1/.html
If they are really found guilty, would anyone dare pick up show babes at car shows or IT shows of above legal age? You wouldn't want to have a ONS, put down-payment for new car or buy new notebook and then have CPIB inviting you for coffee right?
Another lesson to be learned, you can't take down a top cop in court so easily. I m not sure about firemen but I think NBG is going to be much tougher than Durai vs SPH.
2centsworth
15-06-2012, 07:28 AM
When Lee said this, during GE ? :D try to woo more support from man? never remember lai hehe :D
Here is the link. http://publichouse.sg/categories/focus/item/105-s377a-do-not-disturb.
asdfghjkl
15-06-2012, 07:52 AM
so who is in trouble actually.. if the women no crime, how can the men be criminals? :o
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.