Quote:
Originally Posted by slyer
My honest, no hidden agenda, concise FR on
Face: 7/10
Demure, GND, feminine, ancient oriental type of face. Long flowing black hair. Neither very fair nor tanned. Facial complexion generally good ...
Frenching: 6.7/10
(She allowed frenching but not that passionate or intense. Before I painted her pussy, we frenched with some tongue fight. After I painted her pussy, she only kissed lightly & with little passion & no tongue fight ...
Pussy painting: 6.9/10
(Very bushy dark red pussy. Not the prettiest pussy. Tasted salty. Her pussy hair tickled my nostrils when I dived my tongue into it.)
FJ: 7/10
(Relatively tight pussy. Bonked in missionary and doggie. Not commando wild sex type. Most of the time we cuddled and fucked. Sensed she is not that keen in deep passionate french after I have painted her pussy. During the sex, most of the time we kissed lightly, no tongue fight.
GFE: 6.8/10
(Hmm ok only. Not say very high. She was tired that time. Made some chit chats on some topics.)
RTF: Most likely no. Depends. Lots of girls to bonk.
|
Bro, I wonder why he did not thank you for your "No Hidden Agenda Contribution" and yet he went on to thank a samster, Siriusam
who has no not even written or post anything about GL WL since his inception in SBF in year 2012 ... All his 44 posts so far (except the one and only FR on Ling Ling @ 1807) were not related to GL WL ... And he was actively participating in the Local Model Pic thread. Funnily, all of a sudden and out of the blue, he posted a "positive" FR on Ling Ling in the midst of this controversy ... So what does that tells us? This Siriusam's style of writing obviously is not newbie in the GL scene but his almost non-existence in GL Threads since he setup an account in SBF suggests "something" ... I am pretty sure you see where I am coming from ...
Which once famous samsters who are very active in that thread?
If anyone is keen, one can do a search of Siriusam's archived posts in SBF and see for yourself the background of this particular samster, Siriusam.
Omnia thanks him just because he has written a ""fantastically positive" FR on her ... Your FR on Ling Ling is in-between (alittle more towards negative in fact if one can read between the lines) and that suggests why he did not thank you ...
This is very obvious that Omnia has a hidden agenda to promote Ling Ling @ 1807 so aggressively and to the extent of being utterly defensive when anyone said something negative about her ... This is downright hypocritical ... Hahaha ... And
yet he dare to shamelessly tell everyone he is a No-Agenda Contributor ... Bwhaahaha ... What a joke indeed!
Actually I don't even bother if he has an agenda or not ... But
merely to stress to samsters who are not so observant and may be clouded by his mumbo jumbo irrelevant spamming posts ...