Quote:
Originally Posted by Regretfulman
Hi, seems like you are referring to me. Next time just reply to my comment or call me out will be much easier. Im a straight shooter who talks bluntly and not interested in playing petty games.
So lets get to it.
"Low standards" - This is not bringing the spirit of the forum down. In fact, its quite the opposite. I know there are many newbies and lurkers here who rely on these reviews to make their decisions. How do i know? Because my inbox keep getting new messages from such people.
In fact, im doing the opposite. Im doing everybody a favour by being transparent and telling the truth. Go look at all the reviews for the past 50 pages. How is it possible that 99% of these ladies have a 7//10 looks rating or better? Statistically, this is not possible.
The only reason is bros here like to sugarcoat their words and give politically correct reviews to prevent being "zapped" or some gay ass reason.
As requested, i will share some of my experience.
Any chiobu syt right now? Nope.
Review for a so-called popular ml named 99
Looks: 6.5/10. Nowhere as chio as her photos. Face more round and fat, not that sharp. Body not fat but not slim either, abit bah bah. People who say syt are probably trolling/delusional. For me syt is <24yrs,i estimate her real age is ard 28, and thats being generous. Service not bad, friendly, bubbly and chatty.
And guess what? She is considered one of the better ones in the market right now, so that should say something. This is how i justify that most bros here have "low standards". Feel free to disagree, this is just my honest opinion. I have no intention of "bringing the spirit of the forum down" as what you claimed.
|
I appreciate you are trying to bring up the standard but it is possible that most of the good reviewers will rate the girl as pretty (7/10). As a matter of fact we men are more likely to do good things for pretty girls than average girls. In the context of the current market, I will give 99 at least 7/10.