TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"

[wujifoot]

Originally Posted by Bump88

U seem to have very high standards or rather “weird” standards as your view of the MLs always seems to differs from the mass.

I beg to differ. High standards yes, but not unrealistic

I think bro franco knows exactly what he wants ...

tall, nice tits, sharp features and sensual.

If all the above ticks, he returns.

Sorry bro franco, not stalking u, but am I right? Becos I am quite similar

[Franco_Barsei]

Originally Posted by wujifoot

I beg to differ. High standards yes, but not unrealistic

I think bro franco knows exactly what he wants ...

tall, nice tits, sharp features and sensual.

If all the above ticks, he returns.

Sorry bro franco, not stalking u, but am I right? Becos I am quite similar

Hi dude, you're larely right. Bur I'm not so particular about the sensual bit. Just good attitude and can click will do.

Going by the criteria you provided, Aila seemed to tick all the boxes but I met her only a handful of times because she was too popular. Prefer those not so popular. And also because I already had a regular during that period.

[wujifoot]

Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei

Hi dude, you're larely right. Bur I'm not so particular about the sensual bit. Just good attitude and can click will do.

Going by the criteria you provided, Aila seemed to tick all the boxes but I met her only a handful of times because she was too popular. Prefer those not so popular. And also because I already had a regular during that period.

curious .. was Bella's attitude no good?

[Blu3]

Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei

Hi dude, you're larely right. Bur I'm not so particular about the sensual bit. Just good attitude and can click will do.

Going by the criteria you provided, Aila seemed to tick all the boxes but I met her only a handful of times because she was too popular. Prefer those not so popular. And also because I already had a regular during that period.

You do have a rather difficult set of criterias to fulfill. Think you will treasure your regular.

Well, each of us review based on our own personal taste and preferences. Factors like looks and GFE are particularly difficult to make reference to as we view woman diffferently. My definition of attractiveness in a woman is not the same definitely.

So to the bro (Bump88) earlier that comment, take our reviews or comments with a pinch of salt. Your preference might not be the same as mine anyway. Go try then you will know what you want, no use reading a hundred MRs. If you find particular similar preferences as others then reference to it more.

Cheers and happy hunting. My four cents.

[ulysses84]

Originally Posted by Bump88

U seem to have very high standards or rather “weird” standards as your view of the MLs always seems to differs from the mass.

understand what u are driving at, but is just his own preferences so take with a pinch of salt if unable to concur with.

[Franco_Barsei]

Originally Posted by wujifoot

curious .. was Bella's attitude no good?

Using phone a bit more than usual is categorised under "attitude".

Anyway, I find it laughable that people need to conform to the "masses".

[letsi]

Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei

Lol.

To add to my previous post, here's why I won't return:

Bella - no (attitude)
Tianxing - no (looks)
Angel (original) - no (looks)
Xueer - yes
Tianniu - no (small tits)
Youzi - maybe, but alas going back soon.
Cat - no (looks)
Summer - no (too short)
Zhuzhu - no (too short)
Sally - no (attitude)
Bamei - no (small tits)
Qingchuan - no (small tits)
Xiaxia - no (looks)
Mango - no (small tits)
Danae - no (too short)
Lynn - maybe, for old time's sake.
Ziqing - no (too short)
Vivi - no (shop)

This list quite accurate in describing the girls outlook although I've no big issues rtm with short MLs

[heartlock]

Originally Posted by letsi

This list quite accurate in describing the girls outlook although I've no big issues rtm with short MLs

can share what Sally attitude issues as i have book her twice didnt notice it. maybe times changes

[heartlock]

Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei

Using phone a bit more than usual is categorised under "attitude".

Anyway, I find it laughable that people need to conform to the "masses".

to me attitude is no mood to serve customer and showing faces that make you want to leave.doing half past services and chasing you go within 30mins

if using phone consider attitude then 9 out of 10 failed.

[SMRTLTD]

Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei

Going by the criteria you provided, Aila seemed to tick all the boxes but I met her only a handful of times because she was too popular. Prefer those not so popular. And also because I already had a regular during that period.

So am I right to say, hypothetically, if your regular hadn't existed, and Ai La wasn't popular, she would've been your undisputed no.1 choice?

[actprunet]

Originally Posted by heartlock

to me attitude is no mood to serve customer and showing faces that make you want to leave.doing half past services and chasing you go within 30mins

if using phone consider attitude then 9 out of 10 failed.

I don't mind ML using phone as long as frequency is low.

I do get pissed off if ML give me the feeling i'm not welcomed before the 50 min mark. There's a ML whom i booked for 3 hours. at the 2.5 hour mark, started to bochap me and give me the "see you next time" feeling. Needless to say, i left before my time is up, determined not to waste my $$ on her.

Few days ago, she msged me to chit-chat. If you were me, will you go back?
Dilemma as her looks and figure gum me very very much and i was hoping to explore her much more physically and mentally

[ulysses84]

Originally Posted by actprunet

I don't mind ML using phone as long as frequency is low.

I do get pissed off if ML give me the feeling i'm not welcomed before the 50 min mark. There's a ML whom i booked for 3 hours. at the 2.5 hour mark, started to bochap me and give me the "see you next time" feeling. Needless to say, i left before my time is up, determined not to waste my $$ on her.

Few days ago, she msged me to chit-chat. If you were me, will you go back?
Dilemma as her looks and figure gum me very very much and i was hoping to explore her much more physically and mentally

recent only book 2hrs with reg and was a good session. going for another 2hr block again.

[heartlock]

Originally Posted by actprunet

I don't mind ML using phone as long as frequency is low.

I do get pissed off if ML give me the feeling i'm not welcomed before the 50 min mark. There's a ML whom i booked for 3 hours. at the 2.5 hour mark, started to bochap me and give me the "see you next time" feeling. Needless to say, i left before my time is up, determined not to waste my $$ on her.

Few days ago, she msged me to chit-chat. If you were me, will you go back?
Dilemma as her looks and figure gum me very very much and i was hoping to explore her much more physically and mentally

if that case can skip 3 hrs, i will not rtm anymore we must have back bone

[Franco_Barsei]

Originally Posted by SMRTLTD

So am I right to say, hypothetically, if your regular hadn't existed, and Ai La wasn't popular, she would've been your undisputed no.1 choice?

Yes. When booking those not-so-popular ladies, you don't feel that much rush during the session.

[Bump88]

Originally Posted by Blu3

Well, each of us review based on our own personal taste and preferences. Factors like looks and GFE are particularly difficult to make reference to as we view woman diffferently. My definition of attractiveness in a woman is not the same definitely.

So to the bro (Bump88) earlier that comment, take our reviews or comments with a pinch of salt. Your preference might not be the same as mine anyway. Go try then you will know what you want, no use reading a hundred MRs. If you find particular similar preferences as others then reference to it more.

Cheers and happy hunting. My four cents.

Most definitely I’ll always take reviews with a pinch of salt and do my homework before trying the MLs as too many land mines nowadays. And I do agree that diff ppl have diff taste and preference, just that Franco review of those popular MLs are quite the opposite from the mass. I do visit a handful of those in the list and they are mostly good to some extent and most would make the cut for me to rtm.