New Samster In here

[DNAT]

Originally Posted by meatlover

Rep point got free gift har? If not where got impt!

Its not important ... its for FUN

[meatlover]

Originally Posted by DNAT

Its not important ... its for FUN

Ya hor ... Your good friend always say: "Talk = Free one" ...

[DNAT]

Originally Posted by waypastprime

Then u go and ask DNAT how he got such high points. Heard that he BBBJ-ed Sam

Originally Posted by JT

I ask SAM the other day abt this and he smile.

If you 2 really got lam par, go start a new thread and ask SAM to post his FR lah ...

[meatlover]

Originally Posted by DNAT

If you 2 really got lam par, go start a new thread and ask SAM to post his FR lah ...

Actually we're waiting for your FR. 13K+ posts and 0 FR. Quite eh sai leh.

[DNAT]

Originally Posted by meatlover

Actually we're waiting for your FR. 13K+ posts and 0 FR. Quite eh sai leh.

wat FR you want ... 两 朵 玫 瑰 花 刺 青 在 胸 脯 's FR ... ai mai?

[waypastprime]

Originally Posted by DNAT

The bold item ... no more liao ...
if not, lim peh sure got rep power of 50 liao loh - look at my number of postings ...

Do you know what does it mean by 'was'?

[meatlover]

Originally Posted by DNAT

wat FR you want ... 两 朵 玫 瑰 花 刺 青 在 胸 脯 's FR ... ai mai?

两 朵 玫 瑰 花 hilang chapter bisa tak?
atau gua apa salah chapter pun bisa.

[meatlover]

Originally Posted by waypastprime

Do you know what does it mean by 'was'?

WAS, WPP ---> you 2 related?

[waypastprime]

Originally Posted by meatlover

WAS, WPP ---> you 2 related?

I never get associated with someone who BBBJ just because of points.

[meatlover]

Originally Posted by waypastprime

I never get associated with someone who BBBJ just because of points.

Maybe with the points can go GL exchange for free bonks, like those loyalty reward programmes

[farark]

Sigh, another discussion about rep points and its relevance to whether a samster can be trusted...

I miss the old days where we could make a decision as to the relevance of an FR by either first reading it thoroughly and then go recce or attack the objective.

Nowadays it seems a samster with no rep points and power is not to be believed because he has not done enough work or put in enough effort posting of photos, made lots of friends via TCSS (subtle), cut and paste stories from other websites, etc.

I kinda like to see new FRs by new samsters as they provide new perspectives to what I sometimes feel jaded and some samsters even couldn't be bothered keying in the stats, instead they take the stats and cut and paste from other's posts (purely my observation). Of course some are sheer bullshit (then again I've seen bullshit FRs from more experienced and senior samsters), but hey that's what makes this forum fun, to be able to escape minutes or hours at ends to look at the world (of sex) around us and forget the mortgage, car loans, credit card debts for those periods.

To all old and new samsters out there, please be truthful about FRs, cos a lot of samsters here not like some who are very rich, you overkill an FR and make people waste their hard earned cash.

But most importantly, we have two eyes (many singaporeans got 4), but add them together, the mass is much less than that of the brain. Meaning, read everything here and if you want to use the FRs to make informed decisions, then don't just rely on what you see, cos FRs are not WYSIWYG, but rather need the tissues in your brain to analyse before making that decision to part with your hard earned money.

The only thing I seem thankful about my rep power (forget the points, can't be bothered with it as it bears no relevance) because it seems 7 points will give me lots of contacts for FLs, WL gems, etc. These 7 points I give in return for 8 digits (phone number) of pleasure.

Cheers!

Just my 2 satang's worth...

[Vectra]

Originally Posted by Optimus_Prime

I believe bro vectra meant was some post submitted by new samsters that do the following:

1. Exaggerate the service or looks of the gals of a certain joint. XXX is 9/10 in looks and BJ is 9/10 too !! But when go there... see a 30s Ah Soh with rush-rush attitude !!

2. New Samsters who only seem to patronise one joint only and every post is about how good the joint is. A certain nic of a FAMOUS BIG APE comes to mind who was overly promoting one of the HCs when the stable of gals most likely Aunties & Lao Gohs but claim not SYTs !!

I dun think bro vectra is discouraging newbies from posting just saying look-out for people who might not be a true samster at heart who post with some ulterior motive. Hope that clears things up.

Hi all Samsters,
Accept my apology if this post offended you. As I stated in my initial post, there are instance I saw in some thread about WLs or joints coming up and it’s good. But it turn out otherwise.

I still like this forum years back where FR are more truthful. I was shown to many wonderful places by helpful bro here. These days it’s flooded with inaccurate info and my guess was there stakeholder of joints/WLs promoting here. On and off new samsters with M (moderated) kept posting at a particular WLs or joints.

I do not have any means to belittle any bro with 0 rep whatever. Afterall the bigger the group, the merrier the joints to explore. But new names keep pushing the less popular to the top really shows something fishy. Don’t you think so? At least for so old samster, you can click on is nick and “show all post” that he posted. New samster practically cannot…

A few good example is TN joint where some say HJ free, then turn out –neg. You will know what I mean if you just look at the current 1st page. Anyway I rest my case.

[Vectra]

Originally Posted by farark

I miss the old days where we could make a decision as to the relevance of an FR by either first reading it thoroughly and then go recce or attack the objective.

Nowadays it seems a samster with no rep points and power is not to be believed because he has not done enough work or put in enough effort posting of photos, made lots of friends via TCSS (subtle), cut and paste stories from other websites, etc.

Bro farark, you noticed the diff too rite Old days FRs were so "choon" (accurate). Target locate instantly and went out to attack...kekeke

Now there lot's of promotion and TCSS. I even have to read many TCSS to find real info...

[farark]

Originally Posted by Vectra

Bro farark, you noticed the diff too rite Old days FRs were so "choon" (accurate). Target locate instantly and went out to attack...kekeke

Now there lot's of promotion and TCSS. I even have to read many TCSS to find real info...

Having a better understanding of what you meant earlier now.

I still don't know about how choon FRs were then as opposed to now. Probably now the hit rate lower cos too many people in the forum with differing views and likes/dislikes.

Only good thing is nowadays, I seem to have found common ground with many bros into MILF, something sadly lacking in the old days.

Just my 2 satang's worth...

[DNAT]

I noticed a trend of new samsters (Rep 10 Rep power : 0) posting FR in various HC joints saying how fantastic the WLs were. It led me to wonder are the FR genuine or not. Or are they being posted by stakeholder on the particular joint or whatever?

Of course some are sheer bullshit (then again I've seen bullshit FRs from more experienced and senior samsters)

Originally Posted by Vectra

Old days FRs were so "choon" (accurate). Target locate instantly and went out to attack...kekeke

Now there lot's of promotion and TCSS. I even have to read many TCSS to find real info...

Yes, I agree to all the above. However, there is also a tendency that once a zhoon FR is written, the followings are observed:

1. target subject (the char bor) sure form a long quene and her free slots become lesser.
2. her perfromance level deteoriates cos either got more customers on her side or she found a customer better than you or me in all terms.
3. some de-seow-seow cheongsters either criticise/find faults on her, run her tips, give her unwarranted troubles instead of focusing on the sex deal.
4. some samsters even go to the extend of using your good intentions FR to launch a 'must give her good image so step on you' attack.

The above 4 examples illustrate my reason for not giving any FRs