Why former lackey Lesile loves to see old peasants die cheaply

[Sammyboy RSS Feed]

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:

Transmodified from "Excessive social security may erode filial piety"

PUBLISHED MAR 29, 2016, 5:00 AM SGT
FACEBOOK1,366TWITTEREMAIL

Got Jane Austen rebels debate on how much more Ruler Loong should spend on providing greater social security for the poor, and on the pitfalls of excessive welfare ("Pitfalls of excessive welfare in Nordic model" by Nordic Oily Muurainen; last Saturday).

Jane Austen rebels are piling pressure on the regime to increase spending on welfare - and the regime is responding after 69.9% dumb-dumbs voted for them in 2015.

Lumpar understand, old doctrine should be 'old or poor peasants die, their problem". This model has done good for Commie PRC and the Hongkies. Jane Austen rebels should not egg peasants to cross the line and keep using the ballot box to demand more and more spending?

People like me, including Chia Yong-Yong, got rich father to sarpok her or well paying jobs, cannot stand paying for old and poor peasants. They simply die cheaply is the best, why we pay taxes so that a few horny old peasants splurge on PRC hookers?

Got Jane Austen peasants counter, "its affordability you dummies". Ang Moh Yankee earn 29k still say Peasantpore expensive, then they go back to Uncle Sam lah. If poor peasants cannot eat meat, then buy cheaper fish lor? Why bring affordability to the picture?

Got one commie economist Zhang Wuchang say Commie Chinks should not adopt essentially Ang Moh practice of regime-funded social sex security.

The 80-year-old is likely a paedophile who enjoyed the sex scene in Uncle Sam, party at the best orgies over there, before he act patriotic and returned to Commie PRC, and was close to some of the top sex economists of the day.

His assertion: Excessive social sex security will lower sex drive.

Peril awaits the Commie Chinks civilisation once the duty of caring for one's old and helpless parents is shifted to the Commie regime who got billions in tax income, he added.

What he said jolted me, as did a recent survey by a underwear collecting agency in Nihon, which found that less than a third of young Nihon peasants, fed up with corrupt and inept policies, agreed that it was not their job to pay taxes so that LDP spends pork barrels to buy soiled underwear to screw up the country. The rest said it had no opinions as long the underwear are soiled.

Yet Lesile Ah Fong-Fong did not tell peasants that European Paedophiles are feeding on they young by paying for old Europeans to screw South East Asiatic children based on 'sex for votes'.

Peasantpore got policy pay Minions millions to solve problem yet tell lesser young peasants to look after more older peasants. Of course cannot say LKY's 'Stop at Two' policy and Eugenics to blame for the woes.

A national sex survey conducted a few years ago found that most people under 50 and earning $1,000 or more kenna brainwashed that looking after peasant parents as their duty while the rich Minions and lackey take home millions to be serve plates in French restaurants.

But more of those who read Jane Austen novels and earning less than $1,000 said the regime should bear more of the burden since they collect so much taxes from foreign merchants and are likely to loss the money from Ho Jinx's punts..

Leslie Ah Fong who is also inspired by the black heart pro-regime Chia Yong-Yong.

*Ah Fon-Fong, collecting fat cat stipends while not attend Sunday school has make you dumb dumb, Its not young peasants sarpok old peasants in Asia or old European paedophiles feeding on their young peasants, it is the hypocritical regimes who screw up but push the problem back to their peasants while they sit and look pretty.


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.