Xinjinping too fucking Civilized, should give US 2000 DEATHTOLL ASAP

[Sammyboy RSS Feed]

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:

Reputation? China need a new reputation, more tough and brutal than Kim Jiong Nuke by 1000X.

So fucking wrong to be civilized.

Especially towards USA at this time.

I say sink several USS ship in the same span of 30 mins minimum quota deathtoll 2000 to mark opening ceramony. Ready to multiple deathtoll by 50 within a weak, by 2000 within a month. At ANY PRICE. There will be no superpower USA after 4M deathtoll, and business settlement for the superpower status should be rock solid and firm for many decades to come.

No change of superpower status can be reality with stability for long term in this world without sufficient blood. What had to be done have to hebdone ASAP. Xijinping if feeling himself unfit for this job, better hand over the leadership to BoXiLai. Like DengXiaoPing got himself toughened after being stripped off power and oppressed harshly within CCP. China needs leadership that had well tasted enemy blood and as well as (more importantly) ow n blood. Not scholar officer like Xijinping who had not been in war. Being Chinese leadership abov3 billions of citizens, can not be like a little civilized bapok mayor or PeeSai BG scholar. Definately will fail.


http://m.todayonline.com/world/asia/...ina-sea-ruling


China’s reputation ‘will take a big hit’ if it ignores S China Sea ruling

mail
View all 0 comments



PUBLISHED: 4:16 AM, APRIL 30, 2016
WASHINGTON — China risks “terrible” damage to its reputation if it ignores an impending international court ruling on the South China Sea, said the United States early yesterday, while urging South-east Asian countries to stand up to Beijing.

American Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken told a House of Representatives hearing that China “can’t have it both ways”, by being a party to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) but rejecting its provisions, including “the binding nature of any arbitration decision”.

“China has a decision to make,” he said. “(If) it ignores the decision ... it risks doing terrible damage to its reputation, further alienating countries in the region and pushing them even closer to the United States.”

The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague is expected to rule in coming weeks on a case the Philippines has brought against China’s claim to virtually all of the South China Sea, a strategic route for a quarter of the world’s trade and oil.

The ruling is widely expected to favour the Philippines and risks significantly raising regional tensions because China, although a signatory of UNCLOS under which the case is being heard, rejects the court’s jurisdiction over the case.

Washington has lobbied hard to get countries to state that the court’s ruling, expected in late May or early June, is binding. The court has no enforcement powers and its decisions have been ignored in the past.

Mr Blinken said the US had worked hard to build up the 10-nation Association of South-east Asian Nations (ASEAN) as an organisation that “might feel some greater strength in numbers” to take on difficult issues such as the South China Sea.

He referred to a February summit held in California, during which President Barack Obama and ASEAN leaders — four of whose countries have rival claims in the South China Sea — agreed that territorial disputes should be resolved peacefully and via legal means.

“We are looking to ASEAN, as it did most recently at that summit, to express its support for these basic principles and we would like to see that happen when the arbitration decision is issued as well,” said Mr Blinken.

China has been lobbying hard too, and said on Sunday that it had agreed with three ASEAN members — Brunei, Cambodia and Laos — that South China Sea territorial disputes should not affect relations between the bloc and Beijing.

Observers said that it was an attempt against ASEAN unity. Earlier in the week, two of Singapore’s senior envoys — speaking at a conference in their personal capacity — noted that China was splitting ASEAN by reaching a consensus with three ASEAN states on the South China Sea issue, drawing Beijing’s ire.

When asked if this was a Chinese attempt to split ASEAN, Mr Blinken said: “I think there’s a lot less there than meets the eye.” AGENCIES


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.