|
|
|||||||
| The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene Had a great time with a government approved broad in Geylang? Tell us all about it! No FREELANCE crap here please. Legal commercial sex only. Threads about illegal Geylang whores carry a reputation point penalty. |
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
22-01-2015, 11:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Facts...Opinions...Agendas...
1)...Genuine No Agenda Sharing frs r always welcum in SBF...good, bad or otherwise it does not matter....this has been my consistent position all along in SBF...
Fact : I hv disclosed all current frs on this Ling Ling, good, bad or otherwise...in fact i am also going to add on the latest comment on Ling Ling by another samster in my next post... Query: Once again who r these "bona fide samsters" n who decides who r "bona fide samsters" as raised by Max_Priest?...also why does Max_Priest need to raise the issue of "bona fide samsters" in the first place? 2)...Max_Priest confuses fact wif opinion on this one...it is clearly only his opinion n not a fact...moreover, since when must a samster's nick be mentioned as a prerequisite for making a post in SBF?...Max_Priest now appears to be creating his own set of rules for SBF?!...this is a Public Forum n last i checked only Sammyboy calls the shots...furthermore, it is noteworthy that Max_Priest has resorted to bold highlights, which appears to indicate that it is actually he who is defensive, uptight and feeling guilty conscience(sic)!... 3)...Max_Priest is misconceived on this one...pot calling the kettle black relates to his general behaviour n attitude taken in this thread where he tries(but miserably fails) to put me in a negative light whereas he himself has performed in such a negative manner...see my abv posts for more details... Fact: I repeat what i said in 1) abv... 4)...Max_Priest confuses fact wif opinion on this one...it is clearly only his opinion n not a fact...since when is creating a thread for a GL House(in this case 1807) that does not hv a previous thread created, necessarily a promotion agenda?...same applies to frs for GL mms per se...i stand corrected but i thought SBF was a place to share info/frs and not a place for promotion agendas?... I also note wif amusement that my consistent position re Genuine No Agenda Sharing has to quote Max_Priest's apparent good buddy" tingled[" Max_Priest's nerve!!... Fact:...Max_Priestrepeatedly n aggressively promotes his apparent fav GL mms in SBF...i stand corrected but I dont think there is any other samster who conducts himself in such a shameless n disingenuous manner... Max_Priest is also being disingenuous when he says "Honestly I myself also have this intent to help the WLs "!...i wonder is Max_Priest actually "helping" himself to attain his own benefits to the detriment of the GL mms instead?...It is perhaps noteworthy that Max_Priest has thus far declined to answer whether the GL mms he writes about, know about his SBF persona n how, when n why they got to know about this in the first place?..... Fact:...I never set up a thread specifically to promote Ling Ling[....does a Ling Ling thread purportedly created by me as alleged by Max_Priest exist?...no...this thread that i created is for 1807(there was no previous thread on 1807)...is Ling Ling fm 1807?...yes...so naturally all frs on Ling Ling sld be placed in this thread, right!...ironically i note Max_Priest himself requesting for other/more frs on Ling Ling in this v same thread!!...moreover i did the samething for 2033(creating a thread n compiling all the relevant frs), curiously enuff i did not hear any complaints in tat thread?!... Fact:...Nato17 stated thatLing Ling is his kind of gal in response to Nat28's fr on Ling Ling...http://sbf.directory/showpos...postcount=9637...all i did was highlight this apparent rare endorsement by Nato17, tongue in cheek style... http://sbf.directory/showpos...ount=662...now it appears that only a cunning sly person like Max_Priest wif his own sinister promotion agenda wld translate this, wrongly n falsely i sld add, into i" [/I]tried to capitalize on Nato's unqiue preference for certain type of women to indirectly sell Ling Ling[/I]"?!... 5)...i repeat 1) - 4) abv... 6)...i repeat 4) abv...u r merely just showing to all in SBF what a cunning, sly, sinister person u r Max_Priest, by taking such a position...this is yr personality not mine... Fact:...Man Man(16W06) does indeed hv fake enhanced boobs... Fact:...Max_Priest has repeatedly n aggressively promoted Man Man(16W06) in SBF...i stand corrected but i dont think any other samster has done likewise... Oh n Max_Priest now appears to be totally contradicting himself!...First he says"unlike Omnia, I embrace criticism and/or comments be it bad or good one. The issues on Man Man's tits (@another thread) and Ling Ling (in this thread) are pertinent examples"...if that is the case, why is it that now you "cannot accept negative remarks against the WL(Man Man) or query the WL(Man Man) whom you promote and/or promoted"?.... Yes indeed there is definitely more to this than meets the eye... Query: Whose eyes?! 
|
|
#17
23-01-2015, 12:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another comment on Ling Ling
This is the latest comment on Ling Ling fm another thread that i hv taken the liberty to repaste in here...
Said it before n i shall say it again...i fully support Genuine No Agenda Sharing...good, bad or otherwise comments/views does not matter... Quote:
|
|
#18
23-01-2015, 08:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Facts...Opinions...Agendas...
Quote:
|
|
#19
23-01-2015, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Am curious ...
Quote:
Last time u accuse me of being clone. Now u have nothing to say right cos u come to realise I am not. Where is your apology? U can accuse people but u cannot let ppl accuse u. I just can't stand the way u reply to Omnia thread. One last thing is that who care u label me as troll???? I do not give a shit to your opinion. Samsters here have eyes to see whether I am troll or not. The fact I used to hold u in high regards make me want to puke now. I suggest u to get a life outside this forum. I will not go down to your level again to reply to u. U do not worth my time ever again. 
|
|
#20
23-01-2015, 08:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
He is in a state of denial ... But the facts don't lie ...
Well ... In fact I need not say more as the facts are all stacked up here and they don't lie ...
 If Omnia is not uptight, defensive and feeling guilty (for whatever reason(s) he knows better), he would not have "recklessly" come on to make a post to counter me after I made a general and very valid query ... To retierate, what Omnia advocates - "..... No Agenda Sharing" contradicts his actions immensely ... Omnia in fact have an agenda, that is to promote Ling Ling (at least from the surface) ... Don't get me wrong, he has every right to do so and it may be a good samaritan act to try to help her in her business and at the sametime to create an awareness that she exists in GL ... However, I laughed my ass off when he on one hand tries to sound like an angelic figure here and proclaimed to everyone here that he is The No Agenda Sharer ... and on the other hand he has conveniently forgotten that he has an agenda to promote her aggressively to drive her business ... Unlike Omnia, I admit that when I post FR, I am supporting the WL as she deserves my support ... Hopefully she can sustain long enough till her contract expires ... If Omnia embraces comments and FRs be it positive or negative, he would not have tried to discourage me from asking a question which I believe most would find it reasonable & valid considering the significant deviations in ratings ... Unlike Omnia, the issue on Man Man's tits (which he conveniently brought it up) proves that I embrace comment and criticism as I did not bombard or stop him from making a comment ... As I mentioned above, we all are entitled to our own opinion ... What I wanna say and uncovered have been said and clearly unravelled before everyone ... I don't think I wanna waste my time debating with him anymore since he will deny it to cover his ass anyhow ... Cheers, MaXx
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
|
#21
23-01-2015, 08:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Am curious ...
Quote:
I am aware you dislike BG and chided him as the most stupid samster at one time openly ... Don't ever think you are alot better than him as a samster here ... In fact he deserves my apology more than you when I accused you as his clone ... At least he does not make baseless allegation and conduct himself well, at least for the last 3 months ... Are you aware that your idol whom you worship dearly also thought that you are a clone of someone initially when you came on board in this GL thread? But he did not say which master you belong to ... He might again deny it but fortunately I was not the only one he said this to ... He mentioned that to several samsters in the PM as well ... Not sure if this group of samsters still remember ...  I thought I don't worth your while to respond to but why you keep coming back? Likewise, I don't think I wanna engage you anymore as I do not wish to goto your level ... You are nothing more than a troll ... Do enjoy your ride here whilst you could ... Adieu!
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
|
#22
23-01-2015, 11:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is Max_Priest's Real Agenda?
Oh my...looks like Max_Priest has totally run out of gas in his post #20...as all he has done is basically repeat his previous post #14 ...which i hv totally rebutted and demolished in my last post #16. ..this then demonstrates that in substance, Max_Priest has no legs to stand on...!
Anyway let me now cut to the chase... It is noteworthy that Max_Priest has stated "I admit that when I post FR, I am supporting the WL as she deserves my support"... Now if this is truly his only agenda i.e. to purely support the WLs without receiving or trying to receive benefits in return fm the WLs...than I wld not hv taken up the cudgels against him in the first place... So let me settle this issue once n for all n ask Max_Priest this Q(which i hv asked him before but he previously declined to answer, for reasons best known to him)... Quote:
PS...tsk tsk tsk...it is noteworthy tat u r now also a proven squealer ratMax_Priest re yr despicable squealing in post#21 ...dont u realise tat this just helps to reinforce my case tat u r nothing but a sly cunning sinister chap without any integrity?!...btw dont forget u hv also squealed alot in yr pms to me amongst others, wrt other samsters n even wrt to yr professional matters...u really sld go do something abt that deluded huge inflated ego of yrs 
|
|
#23
23-01-2015, 11:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
My Apologies
Hiya Bro,
i hv seen yr pm to me...under the circumstances l wld like to reply in the open... u asked if i once thought u were a clone?...yes i did...but i am man enuff to admit i am wrong when i hv made a mistake...n in yr case i think i made a mistake and for this i apologise to you now...real sorry mate...  oh n while i am making apologies...i wld also like to take this opportunity to apologise to maxSTD...long over due bro...you were absolutely spot on first time round  Quote:
|
|
#24
24-01-2015, 08:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My Apologies
Quote:
. Dun waste time reply to this Max Priest anymore. Let focus on finding good quality wls together. When I join this forum, Samster NATO is one of the few samsters who believe i am not a clone at the start. Thank you.
|
|
#25
24-01-2015, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: My Apologies + When I start something I need to see that it is finished
Quote:
on the Max_Priest issue...oh no but I hv to continue...becuz once I start something I need to see that it is finished... btw u r actually right to label Max_Priest as follows... Quote:
|
|
#26
25-01-2015, 02:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1807
My, my, oh dear, I seem to have sparked off quite a bit of noise in here.
I don't really understand MaxPriest's reaction towards omnia. Now, I don't worship anyone here, nor do I quite understand the intricacies of the etiquette involved in discussing our sordid pastime. What I assume is that the general conventions of a forum applies here. omnia, I thought, very nicely, set up a thread on a house that was previously non-existent as far as this forum is concerned. This is extra information for everyone. He then proceeded to post all reviews about the only lady there, both good and average. Somehow that became a 'fact' that he was aggressively promoting a secret agenda when he had yet to actually post an FR on the lady. I may be wrong here, but I think I may have been the first person to have posted about Ling Ling, a lady that suited me just fine. Some like it hot, some like it cold, some like arse rimming, others like giving the same in turn and maybe with some suction applied to extract the nitty gritty bits but let's not get there now. My point is, Ling Ling was great for me. You see, I don't need someone going down on me in the shower, and then running the tongue all over my body because I hate the smell of saliva, nor do I like arse rimming because I feel my bowels loosening when on the receiving end. GFE from a demure, sincere lady is my holy grail, as opposed to, say, straight out slurping and humping. Putting it in common lingo, different strokes for different folks, mate. Generally, any review is a form of guideline for other onlookers and the best practice is to make the trip down to wherever and see for yourself. As far as I'm concerned, if it's good enough for seasoned posters like omnia, it's worth me taking a look. I rate Ling Ling highly and I will RTF for a long time to come. She's not Federer's game and fair enough and we have Nat who's somewhat in between. These are called reference points, functioning the way public opinion works. Childish, isn't it, quibbling about hidden agenda. We all play with the toys god gives us and I'll leave boys who like to chase shadows with conspiracy theories to themselves but I'll rather check with omnia, whom I reckon has similar tastes, whom I should be gunning for next, thank you very much. Last edited by defunct; 25-01-2015 at 03:07 AM.
|
|
#27
26-01-2015, 09:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1807
Chill & cool down everybody. Let's make love in gl & not war
Let's focus on the wls in 1807 & not digress from the thread
__________________
Beckham07, cassano10, bonkning: Trolls cum L6H66 promoters
|
|
#28
27-01-2015, 04:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You
Kudos to u bro, well said n tks again for the Genuine No Agenda Sharing
...i look fwd to more of yr contributions in SBF...oh n btw u got mail buddy Quote:
|
|
#29
27-01-2015, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I Salute You!
Thank you for yr support bro, it is much appreciated, particularly since u hv taken the effort to cum out in the open forum to do this, which is kinda rare
...I can understand n appreciate why "others" r reluctant to come out in this open forum to speak out as well...but for me the time is right...especially since previously, I was one of the few( if any ) of the samsters to cum out in the open to support Max_Priest when he was seriously attacked by maxSTD viz the credibility n intention of his frs on the GL mms in SBF...i now recall his other open supporter at tat time being none other than Max_Priest's apparent good buddy ...Well more fool me but not anymore...once again my apologies to maxSTD...and like I said above u were right first time mate ...Actually wat a seasoned GL chiongster recently told me viz this Max_Priest issue is insightful... "Most of these are no news to me actually....Not a freshman in GL"...how true mate Quote:
|
|
#30
27-01-2015, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Time To Move This Max_Priest Issue To A More Appropriate Thread
With due respect, this has nothing to do with "Let's make love in gl & not war"...
On the contrary it has everything to do wif whether Max_Priest's only true agenda behind posting his frs on the GL mms/WLs in SBF is to purely support the WLs without receiving or trying to receive benefits in return fm the GL mms/WLs...? In short, do the GL mms/WLs Max_Priest writes abt in SBF know abt his SBF persona i.e. his SBF nick and/or that he frequently post frs on the GL mms/ WLs in SBF...? Saying that...i totally agree wif u that the "focus" of this thread sld be on 1807 n its mms... That being the case, I am now moving this Max_Priest issue to a more relevant thread...HOTTEST NEWS IN GEYLANG DAILY & Gossips thread appears quite appropriate I sld think... So Max_Priest, I still await yr reply, albeit now in the HOTTEST NEWS thread instead...oh n let me repeat, if u don't wish to reply...it does not matter becuz I may already hv yr own reply...more on that later as well(if necessary) Quote:
|
| Advert Space Available |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
