1 bonk and she's mine - Page 12

Snuber · #**166** 25-09-2004, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDevil

Bcos WL are usually at the front line serving cheong tourist. They are among the first group of puyings most will ever know when they first start cheonging. The next line behind WL will be those working in service industry like waiteress, receptionist, sales promoter, etc.. but it do take a minimum level of courage, effort and time for one to approach and build something meaningful. So, most choosen the convenient way to fall and to commit.

Not every WL is out to betray a man that treat them good but their situation are more often than not, complicated and messy, emotionally and financially. Thus, sometimes certain decisions and choices were made unwillingly but bcos of the surrounding circumstances

I agreed with your first point. For the front line, they have to be very service oriented & act as if they are your gf. Most men would fall for this, thought that it's something exclusive they get. Those in the know would call it the "KC" factor.

Your 2nd part reminds me of a guy friend of mine who got to know this WL. Just a few months into her work, she is still considered fresh compared to those who have been in it for quite some time. Her true sincere self is what spurred him to want to get to know her more. They are quite happy together, but then my friend realised that the financial burden on the girl from her family is more than what he can help. And not everyone can stand his gf kena bonked day in day out by tons of men. Pain or not pain on the girl, she still has to work. Thus, they broke off and remained as friends. In a way, the pain is shortened rather than being dragged.

Sornporn · #**167** 25-09-2004, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siamcutey

Hmmm, its subjective, depends on how you see it. Married Personnels are seen betraying their spouses by engaging in commercial sex or sponsored mistresses. Attached Personnels are seen betraying their gfs by going for WLs. Like that?

So define betrayal? We will have a reason for our actions.

WE ARE NO BETTER.

hahaha
SC

Yes, we are no better. Thats why still single and available. Married personels who indulged in commercial sex or sponsored mistresses, some are still caring for their wife and family, while some totally do not care at all. I would consider all these as betrayal.

What I consider betrayal is the guy so blindly think the WL he loved can totally be trusted while he himself has given up his 'fun days' and devote all his attention and finances to her.

Of course to those who are attached... and playing around. You judge for yourself. I believe many people in this forum are practising it. Do not wish to elaborate as not to offend anyone here.

tirak69 · #**168** 25-09-2004, 08:54 PM

in my opinion there is no clear cut answer, right or wrong. it all boils down to the individual and what he is happy with... not for us to play judge and/or jury. the oldest profession will always be around due to demand (from horny men, be it single, married or attached)... else there is no justification for their existence.

so lets just enjoy our commercial sex or sponsored... come what may. if not for us all they will be in SB forum in the first... why? nothing to contribute.

Sornporn · #**169** 25-09-2004, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tirak69

in my opinion there is no clear cut answer, right or wrong. it all boils down to the individual and what he is happy with... not for us to play judge and/or jury. the oldest profession will always be around due to demand (from horny men, be it single, married or attached)... else there is no justification for their existence.

so lets just enjoy our commercial sex or sponsored... come what may. if not for us all they will be in SB forum in the first... why? nothing to contribute.

Agree with you. Pure enjoyment else life will be plain sailing. But not to discredit those who keep a squeaky clean life. To each has his own preference.

Its your life, you choose your own path.

MrDevil · #**170** 26-09-2004, 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sornporn

Yes, we are no better. Thats why still single and available. Married personels who indulged in commercial sex or sponsored mistresses, some are still caring for their wife and family, while some totally do not care at all. I would consider all these as betrayal.

What I consider betrayal is the guy so blindly think the WL he loved can totally be trusted while he himself has given up his 'fun days' and devote all his attention and finances to her.

Of course to those who are attached... and playing around. You judge for yourself. I believe many people in this forum are practising it. Do not wish to elaborate as not to offend anyone here.

Regardless how one define betrayal, I believe everyone , single / attached or married has their roles to fulfill, as someone's hushand / father / boyfriend / son / brother, etc... If he failed in his roles bcos of over devotion to cheonging, he is really betraying not only himself but to all the close one. These are the guys that need help badly and probably a good slap to wake him up. I would rather offend a friend if I could help him from falling into endless hole, instead of being friendly and see him falling deeper.

MrDevil · #**171** 26-09-2004, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snuber

Your 2nd part reminds me of a guy friend of mine who got to know this WL. Just a few months into her work, she is still considered fresh compared to those who have been in it for quite some time. Her true sincere self is what spurred him to want to get to know her more. They are quite happy together, but then my friend realised that the financial burden on the girl from her family is more than what he can help. And not everyone can stand his gf kena bonked day in day out by tons of men. Pain or not pain on the girl, she still has to work. Thus, they broke off and remained as friends. In a way, the pain is shortened rather than being dragged.

There are just too many unfortunate one that beyond what a person could help. If your friend could accept a WL as tirak, he would have got to get prepared to accept the reality that she is a WL and what she is doing is her job. Otherwise, it's wiser to stop each other misery sooner.

siamcutey · #**172** 26-09-2004, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tirak69

in my opinion there is no clear cut answer, right or wrong. it all boils down to the individual and what he is happy with... not for us to play judge and/or jury. the oldest profession will always be around due to demand (from horny men, be it single, married or attached)... else there is no justification for their existence.

so lets just enjoy our commercial sex or sponsored... come what may. if not for us all they will be in SB forum in the first... why? nothing to contribute.

Yup, there is no right or wrong, cos there isn't a clear cut answer. Just that one thing that we always remind ourselves.

Are we able to withstand all the consequences that comes with it? Our Karma.

If yes, go ahead.

For me, I choose to go ahead.

SC

Snuber · #**173** 26-09-2004, 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDevil

There are just too many unfortunate one that beyond what a person could help. If your friend could accept a WL as tirak, he would have got to get prepared to accept the reality that she is a WL and what she is doing is her job. Otherwise, it's wiser to stop each other misery sooner.

What I know is that she has to work for a few years, maybe much longer as she's the sole bread winner. Furthermore, she doesn't seem to know how long she has to work. Guess it's this so-call infinite waiting that pulled the plug on this r/s.

somebody99 · #**174** 27-09-2004, 03:50 PM

...hahaha, look what i got in my user CP:

" 24-09-2004 03:25 PM
Quoting the whole post unnecesserily - appointed moderator "

...hahaha, sorry har sam, do u have an appointed moderator who dun even dare to post his nick? can i know who is this person who 1 time can reduce 3 pts? i m very very curious, hahaha..... so exciting!

rgds,

ps: another thing, pls spell properly ok, u r the " appointed moderator".
it's "unnecessarily", not "unnecesserily"!!! hahahahaha.....joker u.

MrDevil · #**175** 27-09-2004, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somebody99

...hahaha, look what i got in my user CP:

" 24-09-2004 03:25 PM
Quoting the whole post unnecesserily - appointed moderator "

...hahaha, sorry har sam, do u have an appointed moderator who dun even dare to post his nick? can i know who is this person who 1 time can reduce 3 pts? i m very very curious, hahaha..... so exciting!

I think his name is appointed_moderator, you can run a search and see his nick introduced by Sammyboy some time back.

somebody99 · #**176** 27-09-2004, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDevil

I think his name is appointed_moderator, you can run a search and see his nick introduced by Sammyboy some time back.

...hi there mr_devil, long time no see! hahaha...
so, there IS an appointed moderator!
but was he the one who deducted my pts? if it was, then i've got to say that it's this kind of prickhead that discourage pple to post new things, hahaha.....
thanks 4 updating me, mr_devil...

rgds,

siamcutey · #**177** 27-09-2004, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somebody99

...hi there mr_devil, long time no see! hahaha...
so, there IS an appointed moderator!
but was he the one who deducted my pts? if it was, then i've got to say that it's this kind of prickhead that discourage pple to post new things, hahaha.....
thanks 4 updating me, mr_devil...

rgds,

Ok then, let me be the unappointed points addition samster.

hahaha
SC

MrDevil · #**178** 28-09-2004, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somebody99

...hi there mr_devil, long time no see! hahaha...
so, there IS an appointed moderator!
but was he the one who deducted my pts? if it was, then i've got to say that it's this kind of prickhead that discourage pple to post new things, hahaha.....
thanks 4 updating me, mr_devil...

rgds,

Hi bro, hmmmm.. we cheonged before? Sorry poor memory, too much cunt juice flooded brain.

well, anyone could write a nick in that comment field. It may or may not be the appointed_moderator. But then not many has the strength of deducting 3 points, do some readup and search, you could probably narrow the culprit down. anyway, it wont hurts for points to be deducted, you could still enjoy cheonging as happy as usual.

somebody99 · #**179** 28-09-2004, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDevil

Hi bro, hmmmm.. we cheonged before? Sorry poor memory, too much cunt juice flooded brain.

well, anyone could write a nick in that comment field. It may or may not be the appointed_moderator. But then not many has the strength of deducting 3 points, do some readup and search, you could probably narrow the culprit down. anyway, it wont hurts for points to be deducted, you could still enjoy cheonging as happy as usual.

....hahaha, aiyo, u really old liao man! tink u've met up too many bros here liao lah. we met up 2, 3 times. i called u in JB on this year's valentine to check up on infos about JB, in the end went 2 ABB in tink. thanks anyway!

rgds,

ps: thanks to bro SC for ur "top-ups"! hahaha...
happy mid-autumn everyone here!!!

MrDevil · #**180** 28-09-2004, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somebody99

....hahaha, aiyo, u really old liao man! tink u've met up too many bros here liao lah. we met up 2, 3 times. i called u in JB on this year's valentine to check up on infos about JB, in the end went 2 ABB in tink. thanks anyway!

rgds,

Ohh yes, I think I recalled you liao. You were with a group of friends at Eden and ended up cheonging ABB alone during Valentine. We were at Hyatt celebrating Valentines with our puyings too.