Woes of a Cat 40 tirak.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

OBJECTION!

SC, suggest you rephrase the questions... despite his acclaimed presence & knowledge of her.. he was never there to witness & verify many of the questions you raised.

OBJECTION OVERRULED,
because these questions not only can enable everyone to have a clearer picture, also we can know whether Gearknight is telling the truth by cross-referencing with some of your answers.

If there is no truth in it, u shouldn't be afraid with him answering all these questions.

I never did said I believed in all his answers. I am trying my best to give u a fair trial.

SC

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

truth?? LOL... all that you know is the little tiny crumbs taht i feed you, and the tiny fish pellets that she's provided you.. and you assume you know the whole truth?? LOL... before you come forth. better go fix your front tooth lah.

Please do not intimidate the witness.

SC

[suteerak1099]

objection! my response in color

Originally Posted by gear knight

1) May I know what is the relationship between AhRut and you?
ans:good friend visit her in pattaya everyweekend

2) How long have you known Ah Rut?
ans:3yrs

3) What is your impression of Ah Rut's character?
ans:人好心好一點KUAI LAN

4) Have you ever heard about Suteerak1099 from Ah Rut? YES/NO
ANS﹕YES ACTUALLY I TOLD HER I KNOW HIM。

4a) If YES, what did she talk about Suteerak1099?
ANS﹕NICE CHAP BUT VERY LAW SAW。。。LIKE TO 管東官西THAT IS WAT SHE DUN LIKE ABOUT HIM。

5) Did Ah Rut ever used Suteerak1099 to issue a Hands-Off-Warning to another guy? YES/NO
ANS﹕YES

5a) If YES, who did you hear about this incident from?
ANS﹕BOTH PARTIES

6) Did Ah Rut told Suteerak1099 not to call her anymore? YES/NO
ans﹕YES i heard her saying to him on the phone。
CAN CALL HER BUT NO TIRAKSHIP INVOLVE <<<LYING!!! she never said this!

6a) If YES, how did you know about it? And why didn't Ah Rut just change her handphone number and don't give her new number to Suteerak1099.
ans﹕she want to留個朋友做。

7) Did Ah Rut told Suteerak1099 to sponsor her? YES/NO
ans﹕NO IT SUTEERAK WANNA SPONSOR HER。<<<LYING!! i never promised her sponsorship

8) Did Suteerak1099 ever sponsor Ah Rut willingly? YES/NO
ans﹕YES <<<LYING! i didnt sponsor, i only give when there's urgency/emergency


9) Did Ah Rut told Suteerak1099 not to go and find her anymore? YES/NO
ans﹕YES <<<<LYING!! she invited me on several occassions, and even a few invites in the recent mths

9a) If YES, when was that?
ans﹕last month 。

10) Are you able to list all the misc gifts and amount of money that Ah Rut has received from Suteerak1099, if any?
ANS﹕no BECOS I NEVER ASK HER THAT MORE EVER SHE TOLD ME SHE LEFT MOST OF HER STUFF AT HOMETOWN。

ANYMORE QUERIES FEEL FREE TO ASK ME


GEAR KNIGHT

.... the witness Gearknight is making assumptions, as he doesnt know the facts of the cases presented. his statements only bearing partial truth, of which the other statements that i've cited were purely based on the witness' own assumptions and/or imagination.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

SC, you wanted yes or no answers, i gave you the yes or no answers coupled with rationale. you're not interested doesnt mean the jury not interested.

now for your revised Q&A

....3 questions for you..Mr Suteerak1099

12) I am not asking you what is the purpose of the $20K. I am asking you did she ask you for $20K? We are not interested to know what the $20K is for. U just need to answer did she ask you for $20K? YES or NO

13) From your knowledge, Did Ah Rut ever used you to issue a Hands-Off-Warning to another guy? YES/NO - to the ultimate SF carrothead - whom she wanted specifically to stop trying to contact her. for him to stop seeking & begging at the work hse for her contact number. (he knows who he is - i dont need to spell his name)

14) So when I asked you did Ah Rut told you not to sponsor her anymore, you answered NO, meaning to say are you currently sponsoring Ah Rut now out of your own goodwill (or like what you said previously on she has multiple sponsors without the need to give sex in return)? YES/NO - as said, she doesnt need sponsorship. i know her acc was, and still is fat as before... and unlikely to deplete this soon.

ok, so now the conclusion here(from your statement) is she has never asked you for the 20K, and she has used you to issue a hands off warning to another guy.

Also, u have NEVER sponsored her.

15) So now do u meant to say you have never sponsored Ah Rut a Single Cent?

16) So from your description of how fat her acc was, so how long has Ah Rut gone back to Thailand since she finished her tour of duty in SG? And how long has she worked in SG in GL Cat40?
(This question is needed to know whether her acc is as fat as what you mentioned it is)

SC

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by bkkjun

I wonder what suteerak has to say with such a person coming forward to say all that.Is that speculations or what?

i can only say i feel sorry. feel sorry for the clown who thinks he's here to wreck havoc, but eventually shooting himself in his own foot.

he think he's SVU or CSI inspector, when in fact he's just a CMI bummer...

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

i can only say i feel sorry. feel sorry for the clown who thinks he's here to wreck havoc, but eventually shooting himself in his own foot.

he think he's SVU or CSI inspector, when in fact he's just a CMI bummer...

17) Have you met Gearknight before? YES/NO

18) All the things that Gearknight said, did you relate to him? (This question I give you open end, not just YES or NO)

19) Is Gearknight in contact with Ah Rut?

Whether he is here to wreck havoc, shoot himself or whatever, that is for the jury out there to judge, not you or me.
If he cannot show evidence, that means to say he is lying. Not you.

SC

[suteerak1099]

if your questions are intended for the witness... my comments in color

Originally Posted by siamcutey

All these questions are important so as to know the whole story in detail.So u might need to write more in detail for each and every question.

11) How about telling us, when Ah Rut finished her tour of duty in GL? What has she been doing since she went back to Thailand? he cant comment as she never bothered contacting him, until he bumped into her in thailand

12) Do u mind explaining to us, what you meant by Ah Rut is 人好心好一點KUAI LAN in a little bit more details?

13) What was Ah Rut's reaction when you told her you know Suteerak1099?

14) Have you ever met up with Suteerak1099 before? YES/NO

15) What do you meant by Suteerak1099 being VERY LAW SAW。。。LIKE TO 管東官西? Can u explain in a bit more details?

16) How did Ah Rut used Suteerak1099 to issue the hands-off-warning to another guy? perhaps you should ask him to whom the hands off warning was made to

17) Since u said Suteerak1099 also told u that he was used to issue a hands-off-warning to another guy, can u explain how he was used from the version that he told you?

18) How did you find out that Suteerak1099 sponsored Ah Rut willingly when you cannot mention the amount of gifts and money that Ah Rut received from him? he was only making baseless assumptions
Please answer the truth and only the truth.

SC

so it seems, our witness will soon be shown the way out, as the facts/ so-called "whole truth" are vague & partially fictitious...

*members of the jury, i'd like for you to consider the discrepancies of the witness' statements and disqualify his credibility.

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

This 3 girls I never fuck before or even visit them before.

SC

its ok... you can deny ever meeting/seen/encountered/bonked them. i dont have the habit of digging skeletons, neither would it make sense to go searching thru biohazard wastes to justify/verify your trace.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

its ok... you can deny ever meeting/seen/encountered/bonked them. i dont have the habit of digging skeletons, neither would it make sense to go searching thru biohazard wastes to justify/verify your trace.

What i meant to say was i have bonked 1 girl from this hse, but not the 3 that u mentioned.


SC

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

OBJECTION OVERRULED,
because these questions not only can enable everyone to have a clearer picture, also we can know whether Gearknight is telling the truth by cross-referencing with some of your answers.

If there is no truth in it, u shouldn't be afraid with him answering all these questions.

I never did said I believed in all his answers. I am trying my best to give u a fair trial.

SC

he cannot provide truth when he was never an allaby or witness present at scene, nor can he verify the conversations between the gal & i, unless recorded

even so if he was present, all he hears will only be her 1 sided replies, from which his observations will be from afar, and cannot confirm the caller on the line is me.

friend, want to play this game?? SAF GCM was my play ground...

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

.......15) So now do u meant to say you have never sponsored Ah Rut a Single Cent? i do give at time, but never sponsored. (sponsorship - by that meaning frequent/regular)

16) So from your description of how fat her acc was, so how long has Ah Rut gone back to Thailand since she finished her tour of duty in SG? And how long has she worked in SG in GL Cat40?
(This question is needed to know whether her acc is as fat as what you mentioned it is) tour of duty: 23mths 29days. elapse period of ORD: 9mths 28days 19 hours and counting (and received sponsorship for period of 3-4mths from several carrot-heads respectively, concurrent and/or consecutive - of which 1 carrothead piping 4figures for at least 5-6mths or more)

SC

my replies in color.

[suteerak1099]

*readers discretions*
why gearknight should be disqualified as witness? reasons as follows:

1) his claim that he knows her for 3yrs is inaccurate. he may have met her sometime in 2003, but effectively her enlistment was in june-july 2003 there or about.

2) he lost contact with her since Q3 or Q4 2004 until March 2006, for which was unaware of affairs ongoing for the entire period between (or a period of more than 9-12mths).

3) she cannot provide him details vivid nor in chronological sequence, on account that there's been a period of absence at least 9-12mths and/or more, until march 2006, where he met her coincidently in thailand.

4) his statements inconsistant and inaccurate to the details this far, and claims he can provide true and accurate is controvened.

5) he is unable to provide details of events that took place for the entirety, during and between the period whereby no contact was established between himself (the witness) and the gal

6) any or more details from which taken place during and/or between the period where no contact was established cannot be taken into account, and should be deemed invalid, as he was never present as allaby or witness.

7) he was not present nor able to establish contact with her, despite her recent visit to sg in march 2006

8) i put it to you that it is impossible for the gal to recite full details and/or accounts of events taken place during the entire period from which no contact was established - in such a short span of no more than 60days (on account that he states only freq meeting up on wkends)

9) on account of the above-stated facts, gearknight's statements & credibility is inconsistant and duely questionable

10) gearknight's intentions & attempt to expose information with/without consent of myself & the gal remains unclear.

[WorldSexGuide]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

15) So now do u meant to say you have never sponsored Ah Rut a Single Cent? i do give at time, but never sponsored. (sponsorship - by that meaning frequent/regular).

Why do you need to give when she has a FAT account?

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

as said, she doesnt need sponsorship. i know her acc was, and still is fat as before... and unlikely to deplete this soon.

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

i didnt sponsor, i only give when there's urgency/emergency

And also, since she has a fat account, during urgency/emergency, why couldnt she draw from her fat account? Why need to get from a carrot (ie you)? Dont tell us her money is invested in shares/unit trust/bonds etc.

[The_Unrepentant]

Originally Posted by WorldSexGuide

Why do you need to give when she has a FAT account?



And also, since she has a fat account, during urgency/emergency, why couldnt she draw from her fat account? Why need to get from a carrot (ie you)? Dont tell us her money is invested in shares/unit trust/bonds etc.

these are wat i wan to ask also but u faster than me. u know something?

depleted my savings= posb saving acc no $$. Doesnt mean she don have nor never invest in bonds.

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by WorldSexGuide

Why do you need to give when she has a FAT account? ......... And also, since she has a fat account, during urgency/emergency, why couldnt she draw from her fat account? Why need to get from a carrot (ie you)? Dont tell us her money is invested in shares/unit trust/bonds etc.

LOL!! unit trust.. haha. some fine sense of humor. to make it very simple... but dont mean to insult intelligence. at your own discretion...

regardless what kind of figures that comes into the account;
1) there's still times of joyous occasions where gift exchage seems fit for the occassion. dont tell me, just because some1's doing fine, hence he or she deserves less to receive?

2) there are times when circumstances/situations call, where financial status for the week or month is disrupted, and for that i'd sprinkle a little for necessities.

3) by and large, since its not on a constant basis where i'd have to contribute.. then as i've said.. i'm not qualified as sponsor. more over, my contributions not necessarily in cash.. but in "kind"

if based on the actions as listed above, i'd be considered a sponsor/carrot, then jolly well, we're all sponsors/carrots in 1 way or another to all the gals we've patronised - because we made contributions via transactions. LOL