Foreigner take video in petain

[jacky43]

Over at JB Ocean's hotel. There are notices on the walls. No taking videos and if caught, offenders will be handled over to police. Of course PT is not Ocean I nickname "lawyer's office" 30 yrs ago.

[lansi23]

Originally Posted by jacky43

Over at JB Ocean's hotel. There are notices on the walls. No taking videos and if caught, offenders will be handled over to police. Of course PT is not Ocean I nickname "lawyer's office" 30 yrs ago.

Some ports in Malaysia sticked notices about. No camera but most don t - for what ? Such kind of places don t like To be under the networks light - if you re caught with caméra you will explained to girl,okt. ..you was boy aware cos ni bill was sticked
Petain not like ocean? Tell us why? Once inside it s the same...like i wrote a french asshole took hidden cam with desker ang pai.( i know this asshole read this forum) and posted it on hamster,.when one of her customer noticed it and reported To her..the ang pai lodge a police report..the vdo was removed and the identity of the poster ( probably fake..)give to singapore police by the website

[MarkStrothard]

Pardon for saying this.

Honestly speaking, I feel that No video should take on these areas including those in geylangs.

[AndyWoodworth]

Originally Posted by MarkStrothard

Pardon for saying this.

Honestly speaking, I feel that No video should take on these areas including those in geylangs.

I agreed with you, Sir.

[thibaut]

May I know what will happen to this blogger if he was caught on spot "videoing"?

[Amazo6469]

No video taking as it is violated the "Human rights" or "privacy", That is my thoughts.

[Nsf1999]

Video not avail leh?

[chichihan]

Originally Posted by MarkStrothard

Pardon for saying this.

Honestly speaking, I feel that No video should take on these areas including those in geylangs.

That is something that have to be prevented.

[chichihan]

Taking video of those "places" and posted via Online is seem to violate their privacy. Can gov prevent that?

[Ninja_Assassin]

Originally Posted by chichihan

Taking video of those "places" and posted via Online is seem to violate their privacy. Can gov prevent that?

The law is there..... but some "victim" must first come forward to lodge a report to enable the police to commence investigations.

An example is the Nasi Lemak telegram group....... the authorities were oredi aware of the going-ons in the chatgroup long ago...... but were unable to do anything as there were no "victims" initially.
Only when reports started coming in..... then they are able to start investigations and take action.

[liketosleep]

Channel 5 showed Crimewatch on 20 October 2019 about how the police caught two guys who were okts after one lady complained and how to avoid online sex scams. Mandarin version will be telecast on 25 October 2019 at 8pm on Channel 8. Can catch up on toggle if we missed the programme. Play safe.

[aimex77]

Originally Posted by Ninja_Assassin

The law is there..... but some "victim" must first come forward to lodge a report to enable the police to commence investigations.

An example is the Nasi Lemak telegram group....... the authorities were oredi aware of the going-ons in the chatgroup long ago...... but were unable to do anything as there were no "victims" initially.
Only when reports started coming in..... then they are able to start investigations and take action.

Chat group because the group contain porno pictures.And who in the legal house prostitutes want to report?Report for what?Privacy lost?

Remember prostitutes are not treated well by AV .

MR OKT

[arbit80]

hi pls share ctc