Top Dog Angmo Lawyer Screwed Deep Deep By PRC "Student" Whore

[Sammyboy RSS Feed]

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:

Top London solicitor loses damages claim against Chinese prostitute who 'breached his confidentiality' by telling his daughter and colleagues about their liaisons
Student, in her 20s, turned to prostitution to pay her tuition fees
The solicitor, in his 60s, was married and has three children
He is said to have paid her around £20,000 in cash and gifts
She sent information about previous affairs to his daughter and colleagues
By WILLS ROBINSON
PUBLISHED: 16:55 GMT, 12 May 2014 | UPDATED: 20:02 GMT, 12 May 2014

Ruling: Mr Justice Tugendhat at the High Court said the solicitor, in his late 60s, had no right to damages because he suffered 'no real distress'

Ruling: Mr Justice Tugendhat at the High Court said the solicitor, in his late 60s, had no right to damages because he suffered 'no real distress'
A top London solicitor who had sex with a Chinese law student after she turned to prostitution to pay her tuition fees has lost his claim for damages after she told his daughter and colleagues about previous affairs.
The solicitor, in his late 60s and identified only as AVB, sued the young sex worker, known as TDD, for breach of confidentiality at the High Court after she found information about past liaisons on his laptop.
Senior judge Mr Justice Tugendhat, who granted the pair anonymity, said TDD broke a duty she entered when she accepted money for sex.
But while her conduct amounted to a breach of AVB’s right to privacy, the judge said he would not receive damages because although he experienced ‘some embarrassment’ he ‘has suffered no real distress.’
The judge said the couple met in March 2012 when he responded to one of her escort agency adverts.
AVB, who has three children, is said to have paid TDD around £20,000 in cash and gifts, and even arranged sexual encounters over Skype.
The court heard he even acted as her solicitor for a time.
TDD, who came to England to study when she was 18, was said to have sent messages to his work colleagues alleging he had had sex with secretaries, clients and trainees of his firm.
He warned her against blackmailing him. But she accused him in evidence of being a 'manipulator and a bully’, which the judge accepted.
The judge said sex between them was not entirely consensual because: 'AVB manipulated and deceived TDD into giving consent by other promises of assurance, of payment, or of help in her career.'


'She turned to prostitution to make a living,’ said the judge. 'But she kept it a secret from her parents, who would disapprove, and a secret from the prestigious London college where she was studying.
Privacy: The High Court in London heard that the Chinese law student, known as TDD, found information about previous affairs on his laptop and passed them on to colleagues and his family

Privacy: The High Court in London heard that the Chinese law student, known as TDD, found information about previous affairs on his laptop and passed them on to colleagues and his family
He sued TDD after an e-mail from his youngest daughter in May last year said she had received ‘indescribably sickening messages’ from a woman and told him: ‘I really don’t think we are going to be able to have much of a father-daughter relationship from now on.'
He also made ‘entirely unwarranted’ threats including to sue her for defamation/
She asked him for help with her legal studies and he had at first encouraged her expectations and introduced her to a relation who was a Queen Counsel.
He also told her about his previous sexual affairs, including with a woman at work, and of his Brazilian girlfriends.
...'She turned to prostitution to make a living,’ said the judge. 'But she kept it a secret from her parents, who would disapprove, and a secret from the prestigious London college where she was studying'
Mr Justice Tugendhat at the High Court
She suggested to him that he should ask her to give up her sex work.
She then gave up a job worth £1,000 because she could not do it ‘emotionally while thinking of seeing you.’
‘She said she could be an exclusive girlfriend or a w***e, and he had to choose,’ said the judge.
After one quarrel he bought her a £1,000 necklace from Selfridges, said the judge.
She sent information she found on AVB’s computer and memory sticks to his daughter and work colleagues, said the judge,
In his judgment she was in breach of her duty of confidentiality in disclosing that information to third parties.
But the confidentiality agreement she signed was unenforceable on grounds of public policy because it purported to give up her right to complain of suspected exploitation.
He said: ‘TDD has shown herself to be erratic and unpredictable, and ready to disclose private and confidential information when provoked by AVB’s conduct.’
The judge said: ‘I have also found that AVB took pleasure in provoking TDD’s anger and other emotions, and it would not be just that he should receive damages for those occasions when his provocations resulted in the excessive reactions which I have found.’
He said AVB was entitled to an order restraining TDD from further disclosing any confidential or private information already disclosed by her which relates to AVB’s wife and his children.
She was also forbidden from passing on sexual or financial information relating to individuals with whom he has had a sexual or a personal or professional relationship.
But he was not entitled to an order restraining publication of any of the other information on which she based her complaints against him.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz31YcyAIkn


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.