Software to detect fake photos

[IwantbustyKim]

Good to use to for Fake photos posted by bad OKTs

http://www.ctpost.com/technology/bus...to-6363054.php


This fake picture of Sarah Palin went viral in 2008, just a few days after Senator John McCain picked her as his Republican running mate.

History is full of manipulated images. Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong all were known to cut former allies out of historical photos after a disagreement. Even Winston Churchill wasn't above tampering with photographs when it suited him.

Back then, you needed special technical equipment and time-consuming darkroom techniques to manipulate an image. But since photos went digital, it has become a lot easier to modify them, and much harder to tell when an image has been tampered with.

But a Czech startup has created a product that can do just that, and banks and insurance companies are using it to detect fraud.
Back in 2004, a group of scientists and digital experts led by Babak Mahdian came together in Prague with one goal: to build a toolkit that could instantly detect whether an image had been tampered with.



Winston Churchill’s cigar was removed from this image after smoking was deemed unhealthy.

The team created Verifeyed, which uses machine learning to figure out whether photos have been through editing software, and can establish which camera or phone was used to take them.

Traditional digital cameras have several components: an optical system, then a photo sensor, and finally a storage system. Each component has a unique “fingerprint.”

This “fingerprint” can be unique to a camera or camera model, and can be corrupted when an image has been tampered with.

One of the ways Verifeyed spots fake images is by finding out how many times an image has been compressed into a JPEG file format for storage.

If an image has been tampered with, it is decompressed, loaded onto photo-editing software, manipulated, and recompressed.

JPEG is a “lossy” file format, which means that that every time you compress a JPEG image, some information is lost in order to make a smaller file.

When a JPEG image is compressed, it is split into adjacent blocks of pixels. Those blocks are compressed separately, but still have to relate to one another in the same way they would in the original image.

If someone has made changes to parts of the image, they won’t relate to each other in the same way. The Verifeyed algorithm is able to spot these differences.

Once they had created the product, Verifeyed took on contracts with a bank, a media agency and two insurance firms.

After six months reviewing over 1.5 million images, about 2% of the images Verifeyed flagged were false positives — real photos incorrectly flagged as fake.

Now that isn’t a larger percentage. But if an insurance company received 4 million digital images annually, that would mean 80,000 false alarms. A lot of customers could be falsely accused of fraud.

And the Verifeyed product took one or two seconds to process each photo. A company can have thousands of photos to get through daily, so the process took too long.

The team went back to the drawing board. Verifeyed’s clients wanted a system that wasn’t too slow or too sensitive.

After some improvements, only 0.1% of the digital images Verifeyed examines are false positives, and it gets through images in less than a second.

Verifeyed, which now has nine people in its team, would not disclose its revenues to us. Mahdian also says the company has not raised any venture capital funding.

Instead, Mahdian says, Verifeyed has relied on a few business angels, but would not tell us who or how much it received. It also uses the resources of its parent company, a computer vision development firm called ImageMetry

[sammyboyfor]

That software isn't going to detect fake photos. It detects digitally altered images.

[LastApril]

Just go images.google.com and do a image search will do.

No need to install software.

[IwantbustyKim]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

That software isn't going to detect fake photos. It detects digitally altered images.

Which is also what many of the OKTs are accused of...

[sammyboyfor]

Originally Posted by IwantbustyKim

Which is also what many of the OKTs are accused of...

All "real" photographers digitally alter their images.

It's a matter of how far they go.

[WaterSerpent]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

That software isn't going to detect fake photos. It detects digitally altered images.

That was i was also thinking boss