SAF Cpts Vs Canadian Maj: Of Cowardice, Gutlessness & Dishonourable Conduct - Part II

[Sammyboy RSS Feed]

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:

SAF & SAF Captain Heroes Vs Canadian Forces Officer - A Short Study Into Cowardice, Gutlessness & Dishonourable Conduct - Part II

As a Commonwealth country, Canada has a similar "Government Proceedings Act" as Singapore. It's called the "Crown Liability and Proceedings Act" (see below).

So why did Maj Christopher Lunney not rely on the "Crown Liability and Proceedings Act" as a defence as his gutless and shameless Singapore weasels had done?

This is because as an Officer, he conducted himself as one. He acted with Honour.

That, Ng Eng Hen, Chan Wing Kai, Najib Hanuk and Chia Thye Siong, is what "Honour" and being "An Officer and a Gentleman" is all about.

It's not behaving like disgraceful gutless weasels, scampering about looking for something to evade responsibility, disclaim liability and to cover your arses.

With your spins, tai chis, lies, evasions, failure to act honorably and to take responsibility, the four of you contemptible cunts have thoroughly disgraced, and have trash the Values of, wreaked enormous shame upon, and brought total disrepute to, the SAF Officer Corp.


************************************

Section 8 of this "Crown Liability and Proceedings Act" states:

Liability and Civil Salvage

8 Nothing in sections 3 to 7 makes the Crown liable in respect of anything done or omitted in the exercise of any power or authority that, if those sections had not been passed, would have been exercisable by virtue of the prerogative of the Crown, or any power or authority conferred on the Crown by any statute, and, in particular, but without restricting the generality of the foregoing, nothing in those sections makes the Crown liable in respect of anything done or omitted in the exercise of any power or authority exercisable by the Crown, whether in time of peace or of war, for the purpose of the defence of Canada or of training, or maintaining the efficiency of, the Canadian Forces.

Special Provisions respecting Liability
Marginal note:No proceedings lie where pension payable

9 No proceedings lie against the Crown or a servant of the Crown in respect of a claim if a pension or compensation has been paid or is payable out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund or out of any funds administered by an agency of the Crown in respect of the death, injury, damage or loss in respect of which the claim is made.

Marginal note:Liability for acts of servants

10 No proceedings lie against the Crown by virtue of subparagraph 3(a)(i) or (b)(i) in respect of any act or omission of a servant of the Crown unless the act or omission would, apart from the provisions of this Act [See provisions in Sect 8], have given rise to a cause of action for liability against that servant or the servant’s personal representative or succession.

Vs

Section 14 of Singapore's "Government Proceedings Act" which similarly states:

Provisions relating to the armed forces

14. (1) Nothing done or omitted to be done by a member of the forces while on duty as such shall subject either him or the Government to liability in tort for causing the death of another person, or for causing personal injury to another person, in so far as the death or personal injury is due to anything suffered by that other person while he is a member of the forces if —

(a) at the time when the thing is suffered by that other person, he is —

(i) on duty as a member of the forces; or

(ii) though not on duty as a member of the forces —

(A) on any land, premises, ship, aircraft or vehicle for the time being used for the purposes of the forces; or

(B) on any journey necessary to enable him to report for duty as such or to return home after such duty;


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.